1 2025:CGHC:46475 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9653 of 2025 1 - Chhattisgarh Pradesh Shikshak Federation, A Society Registered Under The Provisions Of C.G. Society Registration Act, 1973 Having Its Registered Office At Laxmi Niwas, Plot C-75, Street 15, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh, Through Its Member Harish Dewangan, S/o Late Shri J.R. Dewangan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 29, Hospital Colony, Near Indira Market, Station Road, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, First Floor, Block - C, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Education Division Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Director Education Division Durg, Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Joint Director Education Division Bastar, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Chhattisgarh 6 - Joint Director Education Division - Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Joint Director Education Division - Surguja, Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate, and Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.12 10:47:40 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 11/09/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged to quash instruction issued by the State Government with regard to the rationalization instruction dated 02.08.2024. 2. The learned Senior Counsel Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, assisted by Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, would submit that the Union has already preferred the representation i,.e Annexure P/16 and P/17 and prayed that direction may be issued to respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner. 3. Considering the limited prayer, this petition is disposed of directing the State to decide the representation made by the petitioner. 4. It is made clear that the direction for the decision on the representation, it does not mean that implementation of the instruction dated 02.08.2024 had been redressed by this Court. 5. The present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Alok