APHC010912592018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUN TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 44097 OF 2018 C' PRESENT Between: Dr. N.K.Pradeep Kumar, S/o. N.Krishnaiah, aged about 33 years, R/o. D.N0.4-19/6B, Sri Krishna Nagar, M.R.Palle, Tirupati, Chittoor District. AND ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Venkateswara University, Rep. by its Registrar, S.V.U.Campus, Tirupati Chittoor District. 3. The Selection Committee for Appointment Academic Consultants, Sri Venkateswara University, rep.by its Chairman, S.V.U.Campus,Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. The Vice Chancellor, Sri Venkateswara University, S.V.U.Campus, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5. Marujolla Haritha Academic Consultant, Department of Commerce,S.V.U.College of C.M. and C.S.,S.V.University, Tirupati. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No.E.II(6)/AC/CM and CS(SS)/2018-19, dated 26.10.2018 issued by the 2'^^ respondent in so far as selecting and appointing the 5**^ respondent as Academic Consultant for Commerce-SSC is concerned, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and UGC Regulations and set-aside the same I*'. in so far as selection and appointment of the respondent is concerned and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to appoint the petitioner as Academic Consultant in the Department of Commerce in the 2'"'^ respondent university. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.E.II(6)/AC/ CM and CS(SS)/2018-19, dt. 26.10.2018 issued by the 2"^^ respondent in SO far as selecting and appointing the respondent as Academic Consultant for Commerce-SSC is concerned, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI BUTTA VIAJAYA BHASKAR, SC FOR SVU Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : M/s. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010912592018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 44097 of 2018 [3396] Between: Dr. N.K.Pradeep Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI 2.BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKAR ( SC FOR SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY 3.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No E II6/AC/CM and CSSS/2018-19 dated 26.10.2018 issued by the 2"'^ respondent in so far as selecting and appointing the respondent as Academic Consultant for Commerce SSC is concerned as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and UGC Regulations and set aside the far as selection and appointment of the 5^*^ respondent is concerned and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to appoint the petitioner Academic Consultant in the Department of Commerce in the 2"'^ respondent university and pass " 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent-university. Perused the material on record. same m so as Pfij m 9 Counsel appearing for respondent -University woulS order passed by this Court on 05.12.2018 3. Learned Standing submit that in the light of the interim lA No.l of 2018 Petitioner has been continued in the service and no further in orders are necessary. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner has filed the contempt case and during pendency of the said content case, respondent authorities have complied with interim order passed by this Court and that recording the submission of learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition may be disposed of. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- KJ.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Registrar, Sri Venkateswara University, S.V.U.Campus, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Chairman, Selection Committee for Appointment Academic Consultants, Sri Venkateswara University, S.V.U.Campus,Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. The Vice Chancellor, Sri Venkateswara University, S.V.U.Campus, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5. Marujolla Haritha Academic Consultant, Department of Commerce, S.V.U.College of C.M. and C.S.,S.V.University, Tirupati. 6. One CC to Sri J. Ugranarasimha, Advocate [OPUC] ^ 7. One CC to M/s. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, Advocate [OPUC]*^ 8. One CC to Sri Butta Vijaya Bhaskar, ( SC for Sri Venkateswara University [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 10. Three CD Copies Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 1 ^ . Curreni beciuM* 2=^ ORDER WP 44097/2018 X o DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS