APHC010916292018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 44374/2018 Between: 1. PRABHASH KUMAR, S/O. NARAYAN PATHAK, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC . EX-ASI/EXE., RIO. PARHWARA VILLAGE AND POST, VIA. TARAPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER, BIHAR - 813 221. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, BLOCK NO.13, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003. 2. DICIPLINARY AUTHORITY/SENIOR COMMANDANT, CISF - UNIT, VSP, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 003. 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, SOUTH ZONE HEAD QUARTERS, CHENNAI - 600 090. 5. INSPECTOR GENERAL/SS, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFIARS, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, CHPT CAMPUS, CHENNAI - 600 009. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the final order dt.14-03-2016 passed by the 2nd Respondent and confirmed by the Appellate Authority i.e., 4th Respondent herein vide its orders dt.20-06-2016 and upheld by the Revisional Authority i.e., 5th Respondent herein vide his orders dt.05.04.2017 and also confirmed by the 3rd Respondent vide his orders dt.22-10-2018 under Rule 54 of CISF Rules 2001 as highly illegal, arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional, irrational and to consequently set aside the same and to forthwith direct the reinstatement of the Petitioner herein as CISF Sub-ordinate Officer attached to CISF Unit with all consequential benefits, and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SC FORCENTRL GOVT) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the final order dt.14-03-2016 passed by the 2nd Respondent and confirmed by the Appellate Authority i.e., 4th Respondent herein vide its orders dt.20-06-2016 and upheld by the Revisional Authority i.e., 5th Respondent herein vide his orders dt.05.04.2017 and also confirmed by the 3rd Respondent vide his orders dt.22-10-2018 under Rule 54 of CISF Rules 2001 as highly illegal, arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional, irrational and to consequently set aside the same and to forthwith direct the reinstatement of the Petitioner herein as CISF Sub-ordinate Officer attached to CISF Unit with all consequential benefits, and pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 44374 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*