Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:40058
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9362 of 2025 1 - Ku. Inka Sahu D/o Late Shri Khagesh Ram Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o Village - Tata, Q.No.-88, P.S. - Sarsiwa, Tahsil - Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Chairman/ Additional Chief Secretary, Committee of Senior Secretaries (Transfer Matter), Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Member/ Secretary Committee Of Senior Secretaries (Transfer Matter), Department Of Labour, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Member/ Secretary In-Charge Committee of Senior Secretaries (Transfer Matter), Department of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Collector Office Of Collector, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Chief Medical And Health Officer (Cmho) Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - Block Medical Officer (Bmo) Office Of Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 8 - Shri Ghanshyam Chandra Rural Medical Assistant/ In-Charge Assistant Nodal Officer, Primary Health Centre, Gopalpur, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order
on Board
11.08.
202
5
1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Gopalpur Block Bilaigarh to Pirda, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh.
2
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order the petitioner has already made representation which is still pending before the transfer committee. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below:
“8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।”
3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned
order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder