Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37335
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8976 of 2025
--------- Arvind Toppo, aged about 20 years, Son of-Bandhana Oraon (Toppo), resident of – village: Dhodhra, P.O.-Khora B.O., P.S.- Gumla, & District-Gumla (Jharkhand).
....Petitioner
Versus State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Saurav Mahto, Advocate For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
---------
Through V.C. 03/Dated:-12.12.2025
1.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 366A/376 (DA) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act in connection with Gumla, P.S. Case No.184/2023 corresponding to POCSO Case No.-49/2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the rival parties fairly submits that out of 13 witnesses, 11 witnesses have been examined.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, since the Trial Court is in seisin of the matter and the trial is on the verge of completion, accordingly, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
6.
As a result, the instant bail application stands rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) December 12, 2025 vikas/- uploaded 06.01.2026