Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39446 (AP)

Smt. D. Vandana v. The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams

WP/43704/2018 · 2025-06-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tf IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010903432018 (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 43704 OF 2018 Between: Smt. D. Vandana, W/o B. Ramesh, Aged 48 years, Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Sri Padmavathi Women's Polytechnic College, Tirupati, Chittoor District. A.P. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, rep by Its Executive Officer, Administrative Building, K.T. Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. A.P 2. The Principal, Sri Padmavathi Women's Polytechnic College, Tirupati, Chittoor District, A.P. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by Principal Secretary Government, Higher Education Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. To ...Respondent(S): / Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion as Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology and direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Senior Lecturer in !r Hotel Management and Catering Technology with notional seniority w.e.f. the occurrence of vacancy i.e. from 2013 and declare the inaction on the part of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology arbitrary, vindictive, illegal and violation Articles 14, 16, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India. as lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent-authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.10.2017 for promotion to the post of Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010903432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0;i!0 li; [3396] v- TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 43704/2018 Between: Smt. D. Vandana ...PETITIONER AND The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.C SRINIVASA BABA 2.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: "...to issue a writ order or direction particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion as Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology and direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology with notional seniority w e f the occurrence of vacancy i.e., from 2013 and declare the Inaction on the part of the respondents in not considering the claim of the 2 petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Lecturer in Hotel Management and Catering Technology as arbitrary vindictive illegal and violation Articles 14, 16, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass...” Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and 2. the petition may be disposed of. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No 3. order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// RONOFFICER SE To, 1. The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Administrative Building, K.T. Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. A.P 2. The Principal, Sri Padmavathi Women's Polytechnic College, Tirupati, Chittoor District, A.P. 3. The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. 4. One CC to Sri C Srinivasa Baba, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies TF 1 HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP 43704/2018 V (P I ? rjUL 2625 ^ . Current Seciion . Sfts^fSPATCV'^ m DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS