Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3944 (CHH)

R.K. MISHRA v. AMITABH JAIN

CONT/106/2025 · 2025-02-25

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:9573 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 106 of 2025 1 - R.K. Mishra S/o Late Shri Kamla Prasad Mishra Aged About 68 Years Occupation- Service (Retired As Sub Engineer) In The Office Of P.W.D. Department, Present Address- Opposite To Rastogi Computer College, Allauddin Chowk, Mitra Colony, Tehsil And District Maihar (M.P.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Amitabh Jain Secretary P.W.D. Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - K.K. Pipri Engineer In Chief, P.W.D. Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Amiya Bhushan, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 25/02/2025 1. The instant contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 01/08/2024 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2062 of 2015. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and he placed on record the ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.02.28 18:48:14 +0530 2 / 2 copy of the order dated 24/02/2025 to show that the order of this Court has been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not object to the said submission. 4. Since the order has been complied with, therefore, no deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court is made out. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the order passed by the respondents/contemnors, if he is not satisfied with the order passed by the respondent authorities. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu