TAMILSELVAN v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/8328/2025 · 2025-03-21
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39438 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39438 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025
1. Tamilselvan
2. Sasirekha ... Petitioner(s) /Accused Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, P-5, MKB Nagar Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondent(s)/ Complainant Crime No.910 of 2024 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest at the hands of the respondent in Crime No.910 of 2024. For petitioner(s) : Mr.K.Shanmugam For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page No.1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 118(1) of BNS r/w Section 4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.910 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail. 2. It is the case of the prosecution is that, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and her husband, and abused them in filthy language. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners had also lodged a complaint against the defacto complainant, and in order to counter that, the present complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant; that the injured has been discharged from the hospital; and that in any case, custodial interrogation is not required and sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the Page No.2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and confirms that, on the complaint given by the petitioners, a case has been registered and is being investigated as a case and counter by the respondent. 5. Considering that it is a case of case and counter; that the injured has been discharged from the hospital; and since, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.
Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Metropolitan Magistrate-X, Egmore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall Page No.3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m; [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners Page No.4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. 21.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No skr To
1. The Inspector of Police, P-5, MKB Nagar Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. 3. Metropolitan Magistrate-X, Egmore. Page No.5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. skr Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 Page No.6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.8328 of 2025 21.03.2025 Page No.7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis