Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39438 (AP)

POLAGGARI SIVA SHANKAR REDDY v. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR -CUM- LAO

CRP/5662/2017 · 2025-06-25

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010900732017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI \oU \CK THURSDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE i' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE >■ V'/ ^•0/ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5662 OF 2017 Petition under Section 115 of CPC, CRP Aggrieved by the orders E.P.No.35/2016 in LAO.P.No.100/1995, dt 14-06-2017 Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur in on the file of the Between: Polaggari Siva Shankar Reddy, S/o Pedda Sanjeeva Reddy R/o Talamudipi Village Nandikotkur mandal Kurnool District ...PetItioner/D.Hr/Claimant AND Special Deputy Collector Cum LAO, S.R.B.C.Nandyal Kurnool District ...Respondent/J.Dr/Referring Officer lA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 7337 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 39 days in filing the CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following: c APHC010900732017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5662/2017 [3460] Between: Polaggari Siva Shankar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND Special Deputy Collector Cum Lao Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT % HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.R.P.No.5662 of 2017 JUDGMENT: This revision is filed questioning the order dated 14.06.2017 in E.P.No.35 of 2016 in L.A.O.P.No.100 of 1995 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur. 2. Sri K.Sajid, representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the E.P. was dismissed on 14.06.2017 and in view of the dismissal of E.P. action survives in this revision and the same stands dismissed as infructuous. no cause of Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the civil revision is dismissed as infructuous giving liberty to the Petitioner to re-agitate the issue in case there is any requirement. No order as to costs, miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. As a sequel, the SDI- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER The Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. One CC to Sri. P.Nagendra Reddy Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. GP for Arbitration, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 5. Three CD Copies //TRUE COPY// To, 1. 2. 3. MKP AL HIGH COURT DATE0:26/06/2025 of ORDER CRP 5662/2017 S> X i\ juu2n?5 m eoi= ^ Current Section ^yi CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS