Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39430 (BOM)

ANANDA SITARAM PATIL v. SACHIN VASANTRAO BHOSALE AND ANR.

ALP/73/2023 · 2025-10-07

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10-ALP-73-2023 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT) NO. 73 OF 2023 Ananda Sitaram Patil ...Applicant Versus Sachin Vasantrao Bhosale And Anr. ...Respondent Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar Advocate for the Applicant Ms. Veera Shinde APP for the State CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2025. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Service report of respondent no. 1 is awaited. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file appeal before the Sessions Court in view of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Versus A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant, application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. If applicant files appeal before the Sessiosn Court, the Sessions Court shall consider condonation of delay for filing appeal as 1 2025 SCC OnLine 1320 Iresh IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.10.09 11:19:12 +0530 10-ALP-73-2023 (CR).DOC observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial. 4. Application is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Iresh