SHRI. KARABASAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA KARADI v. THE PRESIDENT,
WP/101110/2025 · 2025-04-16
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3943 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3943 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6502 WP No. 101110 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101110 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI. KARABASAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA KARADI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KATENAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS MILK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, R/O: KATENAHALLI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGANAGOUDA R. KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE PRESIDENT, KATENHALLI MILK PRODUCERS MILK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, R/O: KATENAHALLI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI-581 116.
2.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HAVERI DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION, HAVERI-581 116.
3.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, HAVERI, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BHAVAN, HAVERI-581 116.
4.
SHRI BASAVARAJ S/O HEMANNA KARIYAPPANAVAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: CLAIMING TO BE CEO OF KATENAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6502 WP No. 101110 of 2025
MILK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, R/O: KATENAHALLI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI-581 116.
5.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HAVERI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI-581 116.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. N.S.KINI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R3-R5;
SRI. SHIVARAJ S.BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Nagangouda R.Kuppelur., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person and submits that a memo is filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition.
3. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6502 WP No. 101110 of 2025
4. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,RH LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 14.1