Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39428 (RAJ)

MINAKSHI JANGID DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAMROOP JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15757/2025 · 2025-10-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15757/2025 Minakshi Jangid Daughter Of Shri Ramroop Jangid, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Bhank Pura, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Inspector General Of Police Ajmer, Range Ajmer (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by order dated 11.08.2014 in the case of Arun Choudhary and Ors. Vs. State and Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5255/2013 and connected matters, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and further referred in case of Manisha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11557/2025 order dated 30.07.2025 and order passed by this Court in case of Ratan Lal [2025:RJ-JP:41949] (2 of 3) [CW-15757/2025] Gadri Vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15517/2025 order dated 09.10.2025. 2. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, issue notice to respondents. 3. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma appearing on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents. He placed reliance upon order dated 05.04.2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.61/2024 (State of Rajasthan And Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar at Principal Seat, Jodhpur). 4. Considered submissions of learned counsels for the parties. 5. The controversy involved in the present matter is no more res integra and same is resolved by order dated 11.08.2014 in the case of Arun Choudhary and Ors. Vs. State (supra) and Horkha Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: SB CWP No.277/2017 (order dated 08.09.2020 at Principal Seat, Jodhpur). 6. A Coordinate Bench of this Court on 30.07.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11557/2025 has also disposed of the matter after placing reliance upon judgment in case of Arun Choudhary and Ors. Vs. State (supra). 7. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of order passed in case of Arun Choudhary and Ors. Vs. State (supra) and order dated 05.04.2024 in case of State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar (supra). 8. In view of judgments as referred hereinabove, the respondents are directed to issue relieving order to petitioner within a period of one week subject to deposition of training expenses (as directed) in case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Vinod [2025:RJ-JP:41949] (3 of 3) [CW-15757/2025] Kumar Meena (supra) so as to enable them to join new place of posting thereafter. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /81