Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010909102016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 20436/2016
Between:
P.nageswara Rao, Srikakulam Dist
...PETITIONER AND
Md Apdcl Visakhapatnam 2 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2.
METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Mallikarjuna, learned counsel representing Sri K.B.Rammanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the
2 subsequent events, the lis in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Dated: 25.04.2025 PSA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 20436 of 2016
Date: 25.04.2025
PSA