APHC010887692018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. Prema Balakrishna, S/o Kodandaram Aged 34 Years, Working as Attender, Prema Aided High School Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, R/o Visakhapatnam 1. The Prema Aided High School, Rep. by its Co D.Ch.Venkata Rao, Hindu, aged about 50 years, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The District Educational Officer, Office situated as Udyog Bhavan, VUDA, Siripuram, Junction ,Visakhapatnam 3. The Regional Joint Director o East Godavari District. 4. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42889 OF 2018 1. Prema Balakrishna, S/o Kodandaram Aged 34 Years, Working as Attender, Prema Aided High School Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, R/o Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner AND 1. The Prema Aided High School, Rep. by its Correspondent, D.Ch.Venkata Rao, Hindu, aged about 50 years, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The District Educational Officer, Office situated as Udyog Bhavan, VUDA, Siripuram, Junction ,Visakhapatnam 3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI 1. Prema Balakrishna, S/o Kodandaram Aged 34 Years, Working as Attender, Prema Aided High School Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, R/o Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner rrespondent, D.Ch.Venkata Rao, Hindu, aged about 50 years, Daba Gardens, 2. The District Educational Officer, Office situated as Udyog f School Education, Kakinada, 4. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Andhra ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order, orders or directions particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization of his services in the existing vacant post of Attender in 5th respondents school by disposing his representation dated .7.2.2018 and 14.9.2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to dispose the representation dated. 7.2.2018 and 14.9.2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42889 OF 2018 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ or order orders or directions particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization of his services in the existing vacant post of Attender in 5th respondents school by disposing his representation dated 7 2 2018 and 14 9 2018 and pass.” 2. Heard Sri K.R.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader representing on behalf of the School Education. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present writ petition has been filed seeking regularization of services. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authorities have passed orders rejecting the petitioner’s claim for regularization. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the said orders. 4. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders passed by the respondent authorities rejecting the claim for regularization, in accordance with the government rules and law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.07.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.42889 of 2018 Dated.09.07.2025 KKV 91