S.N. LAL v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH
ABAIL/8996/2020 · 2025-10-07
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8996 of 2020 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Sri Gopal Das Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for C.B.I. are present.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in RC No. 0062005(A) 0018, Criminal Case No. 960 of 2020, under Sections 468, 471, 420, 120B IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) P.C. Act, Police Station CBI/ACB, Lucknow with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submits, at present applicant is not having any apprehension of arrest, therefore, instant application may be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Learned counsel for C.B.I. is having no objection.
5. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. October 8, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, Gopal Das Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) S.N. Lal .....Applicant(s) Union Of India Through Central Bureau Of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad