f APHC010886422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at amaravati WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. CLVIL REVISION PETITION MO; 5860 OF rr.T “ '* •» .A.No.1250/2016 in I.A.No.2073/2015 in IA No 919/2015 in 14/07/2°oT°'' ^ated: Between: DAY OF JULY FIVE N Kakani Sridhar Rao, S/O.Pitchaiah Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal Hindu, Occ.Cultivation R/O.Pallepadu Guntur District ...PETITIONER AND 1- Kottapti Veeramma Occ.Housewife, R/O.Pallepadu Village 2. Korrapati Seshamma And Three Others W/O.Tirupataiah, Hindu Guntur District W/O.Veeraiah R/O.Pallepadu Village, Guntur District 3. Ginjupalli Bullemma, W/O.Chenchu Nannapanenivaripalem, Vangipuram Hindu, Occ.Housewife Rama, Hindu, Occ.Housewife ’ P^thipadu, Guntur District R/0. / f r 4. Korrapati Ravinder Babu, S/0. Guntur District Kotaiah Hindu, R/O.Pallepadu Village ...RESPONDENTS jA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 7fi67 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated m the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in suit O.S.NO.434/2013 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge .Guntur, pending Disposal of the above CRP Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. P VIJAYA KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents : SRI. MD SALEEM The Court made the following ORDER : / r' / 1 HN,J C.R.P.No.5860 2017 APHC010886422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5860/2017 Between: 1.KAKANI SRIDHAR RAO, S/O.PITCHAIAH, HINDU, OCC:CULTIVATION, R/O.PALLEPADU VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANUAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.KOTTAPTI VEERAMMA AND THREE OTHERS, W/O.TIRUPATAIAH, HINDU, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, R/O.PALLEPADU VILLAGE GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.KORRAPATI SESHAMMA W/O.VEERAIAH, HINDU, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O.PALLEPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3.GINJUPALLI BULLEMMA, OCCiHOUSEWIFE VANGIPUARAM, PATHIPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4.KORRAPATI RAVINDER BABU R/O.PALLEPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT W/O.CHENCHU RAMA, HINDU NANNAPANENIVARIPALEM R/0. S/0. S/0. KOTAIAH HINDU ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMay be pleased to set aside the orders passed in I.A.No. 1250/2016 in I.A.No.20173/2015 in I.A.No.919/ioi 5 in O.S.No.424/2013 on the file of the Prncipal JUnior Civil Judge Guntur, dated: 14/07/2017 and pass 2 !MP: 10F ?oi7^cRPMP Tr., rr -n IT Pstition uncl6r Ssction in the affidavit filed in support of the neo'""® '^'''nnmstances stated ro stay al, further Proceeding: L ^uifOS Noanf P'^-el nncpal Junior Civil Judge , Guntur .pending D?sposal of the°"h Counsel for the Petitioner: IPVIJAYAKIRAN Counsel for the Respondents): 1MDSALEEM HN^ C-R.P.No.5860_20l^ / / 3 HN,J C.R.P.No.5860 2017 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel appearing virtually for the petitioner submits that he has given no objection for engaging other counsel in this matter. There is representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents is present and submits that the this Civil Revision Petition is filed, aggrieved by the dismissal of the I.A. filed for condonation of delay of 296 days. I.A.No.1250 of 2016 in I.A.No.2073 of 2015 in I.A.No.919 of 2015 in O.S.no.424 of 2013 no was filed, praying to condone a delay of 296 days in filing an application to set aside the order of dismissal dated 02.05.2016 in I.A.No.2073 of 2015. The learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, had dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff failed to pay bata though sufficient time was granted, and that the petitioner had filed the petition with a simple averments that he was suffering from ill health, without any substantiating documents. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that further proceedings in the suit were stayed by an order by this Court dated 29.12.2017, and that he is not sincerely contesting the delay portion, subject to issuance of a direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial in O.S.No.424 of 2013. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the suit is now presently on the file of V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur. 4 HN,'M 5. Considering the same, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed AUhe same time, the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge expedite the trial and dispose off the suit preferably within months from the date of the receipt of this order, to costs. Guntur, is directed to a period of six (06) There shall be no order as As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions if any, sh^stand closed. SD/- N.NAGAMMA assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Civil Judge, (Junior Division) 2. One CC to Sri. P Vijaya Kiran Advocate 3. One CC to Sri. MD 4. The Section Officer Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Guntur. [OPUC] Saleem Advocate [OPUC] , VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at mkp TAC HIGH COURT DATED:23/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 5860 OF 2017 ALLOWING THE CRP