APHC010885802018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42757/2018 Between: 1. SANDHYAPOGU SANJEEVAMMA, W/O BANDARI RAJESH AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/O GUNDREVULU VILLAGE C.BALAGAI MANDAL, KURNOOL DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT FOR WOMEN CHILDREN DISABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. DISTRICT LEVEL SELECTION COMMITTEE, REP BY ITS CHAIRPERSON CUM DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE AT KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILDREN DISABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS DEPT KURNOOL DIST. 4. THE PROJECT OFFICER ICDS, PATHIKONDA, KURNOOL DIST ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in non receiving the application for the post of Anganwadi worker for Bodepadu village,Pathikonda sector in pursunce of the notification on the ground that the petitioner is not having required age as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to receive the application for the post of anganwadi worker and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DADI RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in non receiving the application for the post of Anganwadi worker for Bodepadu village, Pathikonda sector in pursunce of the notification on the ground that the petitioner is not having required age as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to receive the application for the post of anganwadi worker and to pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 42757 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*