APHC010884452018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 43713/2018 Between: 1. G. SANYASINAIDU, S/O G. SATYAM NAIDU, OOC. MANDAL SAMAKHYA CLUSTER COORDINATOR (DISMISSED), H.NO1.129, GARSINGI VILLAGE, TENUGUPOODI POST, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PEDARIKA NIRMULANA SAMSTHA (POVERTY ERADICATION SAMSTHA), AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P. 2. COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 29-6-8/1, NAKKALA ROAD, SURARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT- A.P. 3. SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATION OF RURAL POVERTYSERP, 2ND FLOOR, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520001. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, D.R.D.A.,(VELUGU), VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THE ZILLA SAMAIKHYA, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. MANDAL SAMAIKHYA, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records relating to the R.C.No.CBO-Hr/11/2013, dt.28-02-2013 and procgs no.CBO-HR/03/2013, dt.04/01/2013 issued by the 5th respondent and set aside the same as unjust, without any basis and contrary to law besides violation of Terms and Conditions of contract of employment of Mandal Samaikhya Cluster Coordinators of Zilla Samaikhya 2012, violation of 2 Art.14 and 16 of Constitution of India and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate me into services with all consequential benefits and pass The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records relating to the R.C.No.CBO-Hr/11/2013, dt.28-02-2013 and procgs no.CBO-HR/03/2013, dt.04/01/2013 issued by the 5th respondent and set aside the same as unjust, without any basis and contrary to law besides violation of Terms and Conditions of contract of employment of Mandal Samaikhya Cluster Coordinators of Zilla Samaikhya 2012, violation of Art.14 and 16 of Constitution of India and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate me into services with all consequential benefits and pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 43713 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*