APHC010890722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 42983/2018 Between: 1. SUGALI ANASUYAMMA, W/O RAMESH NAYAK AGED 28 YEARS, OCC. BRANCH POST MASTER,A NARAYANAPURAM(BO) R/O H NO 1/3/598, SVNR APARTMENTS, 4TH ROAD, RANGASWAMY NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR-1 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OF ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATMAKUR POLICE STATION ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. B HARI KUMAR, S/O MARENNA, AGED 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION.CONTRACTOR, R/O D NO 9-175, P KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL. ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.42983 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Poke in not investigating the case fairly despite of specific allegations on the unofficial respondents involvement into the mysterious unnatural death of the deceased who is the Petitioners brother and closing the same as a 304 (B) of IPC only is illegal and unlawful and dereliction of their duties part from being violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent 2 to hand over the case to CBCID Police and order to conduct a fair investigation by registering an offence U/S 302 of IPC and SC ST prevention of Atrocities Act against the unofficial respondent and award compensation thereby do justice to the family members of the Deceased…” 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 4 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.01.2025. psk 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 25 WRIT PETITION No:42983 OF 2018 Date: 03.01.2025 w psk