APHC010887142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. P.GOLLA BABU, S/O. SRI VARADHARAJULU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.73-23-7/20, FLAT NO.301, SRI SAI RESIDENCY, BEHIND NAGAMMA THALLI GUDI, SRINIVASA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY 533 103. E.G. DISTRICT. 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HR DEPARTMENT, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, BANK STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD - 500 095. 2. THE DY GENERAL MANAGER HR SECTION, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA, TIRUPATHI DIST., A.P. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, REGION OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, 2ND CROSS, SAI NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KALYANDURG BRANCH, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DIST., A.P Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of "Mandamus" or appropriate writ pleased to (i) declare the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24817/2016 P.GOLLA BABU, S/O. SRI VARADHARAJULU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. 7/20, FLAT NO.301, SRI SAI RESIDENCY, BEHIND NAGAMMA THALLI GUDI, SRINIVASA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY 533 103. E.G. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HR DEPARTMENT, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, BANK STREET, KOTI, 500 095. THE DY GENERAL MANAGER HR SECTION, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA, TIRUPATHI - 517 501, CHITTOOR HE REGIONAL MANAGER, REGION-I, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, 2ND CROSS, SAI NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR - 515001, ANANTHAPUR DIST., A.P. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KALYANDURG BRANCH, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DIST., A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of "Mandamus" or appropriate writ pleased to (i) declare the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM P.GOLLA BABU, S/O. SRI VARADHARAJULU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. 7/20, FLAT NO.301, SRI SAI RESIDENCY, BEHIND NAGAMMA THALLI GUDI, SRINIVASA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY - ...PETITIONER STATE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HR DEPARTMENT, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, BANK STREET, KOTI, THE DY GENERAL MANAGER HR SECTION, ADMINISTRATIVE 517 501, CHITTOOR I, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, 2ND CROSS, SAI 515001, ANANTHAPUR DIST., A.P. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KALYANDURG ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of "Mandamus" or appropriate writ pleased to (i) declare the 2 HMRK,J W.P.No.24817 of 2016 proceedings No.(HR-1) 620, dated : 30.06.2016 rejecting the request of the petitioner for cancellation of the reversion is illegal and arbitrary and (ii) declare that the proceedings No.HR/9-1106, dated : 09.12.2015 of the HR Section, Administrative Office, Tirupathi as illegal and arbitrary and (iii) declare the proceedings No.(HR-1)/1656, dated : 07.12.2015 issued by the DGM & Circle Development Officer, HR Department, Local Head Office, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to continue the petitioner in the post of Officer 3MGS-I and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 3 HMRK,J W.P.No.24817 of 2016 The Court made the following Order: On 20.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and as well for the respondents. Today also, in spite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appeared. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 27.06.2025 MDP