120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3047-2025 DECIDED ON: 27.03.2025 NARINDER KUMAR SALHOTRA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Pooja, Advocate for Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 & 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members at the hands of private respondents as they are giving threats to the petitioner and his family members due to property dispute. The petitioner and his family members are receiving constant threat from the private respondents and despite the representation dated 27.02.2025, no action has been taken. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 27.02.2025 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2- POONAM NEGI 2025.03.28 20:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3047-2025 -2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Gurdaspur is directed to look into the representation dated 27.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The order so passed in the said representation shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of one week thereafter. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 27.03.2025 JUDGE Poonam Negi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No POONAM NEGI 2025.03.28 20:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document