Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39400 (RAJ)

NADAAN S/O LATE HARIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12485/2025 · 2025-10-14

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12485/2025 Nadaan S/o Late Hariram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jhopda, P.s. Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur. (Confined In Sawai Madhopur Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.29/2025 registered at Police Station Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 340(2), 303(2), 61(2)(b) BNS and Section 13 RPGO Act and Sections 66C, 66D of the IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation of causing cyber fraud has been levelled against the co-accused Vikram Singh, to whom indulgence of bail has already been extended by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that his account was used by the co-accused for which, a sum of Rs.5,000/- was given to him. Counsel submits that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents and the (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12485/2025] alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time to conclude and the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2025, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to him. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the main accused-Vikram Singh has already been granted indulgence of bail and the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2025 and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Nadaan S/o Late Hariram arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/147