Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 394 (CHH)

LAXMI NARAYAN v. SATRUPA (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

WP227/533/2025 · 2026-03-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 533 of 2025 1 - Laxmi Narayan S/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 55 Years 2 - Shrimati Durgabai Wd/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 87 Years 3 - Manmohan Raikawar S/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 65 Years 4 - Rudra Kumar Raikawar S/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 63 Years 5 - Nirmal Kumar Raikawar S/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 61 Years 6 - Shrimati Laxmi Raikawar D/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 59 Years 7 - Shrimati Jayanti Raikawar D/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 57 Years 8 - Shrimati Annapurna Raikawar D/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 57 9 - Krishna Kumar S/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 53 Years 10 - Shrimati Sumitra Raikawar D/o Late Phool Chand Raikawar Aged About 51 Years Petitioners 1 to 10, all R/o Village- Parpa, Tehsil- Jagdalpur, District- Baster, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Satrupa (Dead) Through Legal Representative 1.1 - (A) Rajendra S/o Late Rammurti Shukla Aged About 48 Years R/o Sadar Ward, Jain Mandir Road, In Front Of Neha Bengal Store, Jagdalpur, Tehsil- Jagdalpur, District- Baster, CG 1.2 - (B) Hariom Tiwari Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Aamaguda, Jagdalpur, District- Baster, C.G. 1.3 - (C) Smt. Anuradha W/o Abhishek Shukla Aged About 51 Years R/o 16, Queens Garden, Tirath Kunj, Income Tax Colony, Quarter No.-5, Pune, Maharashtra, 411001 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector- Bastar, District- Baster, Collector Office, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.03.30 18:41:20 +0530 Wp227 533 of 2025 2 For Petitioners : Shri Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ashutosh Trivedi, PL For Respondent-1a : Sgru Akash Pandey, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30.03.2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the learned trial Court for demarcation of suit land, after decision of his application filed there, under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC, if so advised. 2. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners formally opposed by the learned counsel for the opposite party. 3. Considering the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty that the petitioners may avail remedy before the learned trial Court after decision of amendment application which is pending before it, and in such eventuality, learned trial Court shall decide the application filed by the petitioners on its own merits. 4. With the aforesaid observation and liberty, present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma