Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39398 (RAJ)

RATANLAL JAKHAR S/O BANNARAM JAKHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14302/2025 · 2025-11-25

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47707] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13042/2025 Vasim Akram S/o Abdul Sattar, Aged About 35 Years, Old Resident Of Qayamkhaniyon Ka Mohalla, Kishangarh Renwal, Near Jama Masjid, Kishangarh, Renwal Police Station District Jaipur. (Currently In Judicial Custody, Sub Jail, Sambhar Lake). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14302/2025 Ratanlal Jakhar S/o Bannaram Jakhar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhukharon Ki Dhani, Bhaislana, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur. (At Present In Sub Jail Sambharlake) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Adarsh Singhal, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat, Adv. Mr. Tejpal Rulaniya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 25/11/2025 These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.317/2025 registered at Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:47707] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13042/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. They further submit that the charge-sheet has already been filed. They also submit that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant has opposed these bail applications. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely (1) Vasim Akram S/o Abdul Sattar and (2) Ratanlal Jakhar S/o Bannaram Jakhar shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. A copy of this order be placed in the connected file. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /80-81