APHC010884412017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5503 OF 2017 Between: Golla Lakshmi Supraja, W/o. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao, Hindu, aged about 34 years. House Wife, R/o. Kota Street, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND Chimakurthy Yedukondalu, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged 39 years, Hindu, Occ. Business Tea Stall, R/o. YSR Road, Kanigiri (V&M), Prakasam District. ...Respondent Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to call for record in respect of O.S.No.84/2012 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri and consequently set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 24.08.2016 passed in O.S.No.84/2012 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent: --- The Court made the following ORDER: 3K»^' ' APHC010884412017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5503/2017 [3460] V. Between: Golla Lakshmi Supraja, Prakasam Dist AND Chimakurthy Yedukondalu Prakasam Dist Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent: ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT 1. The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5503 of 2017 ORDER: 1. The present C.R.P is filed questioning the dismissal of suit O.S.No.84 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri, Prakasam District, as not maintainable, as the Petitioner should file the suit before the Rent Control Tribunal. This Court is of the opinion that the Judgment and Decree in a suit could not be challenged by way of Revision and the same should have been challenged only by way of appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code. 2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as not maintainable. The time expended before this Court shall be excluded for the purpose of calculating limitation for any appeal/suit to be filed by i* - tv the Petitioner. 3. 4. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri. 2. One CC to Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Two CD Copies Chp vna HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER CRP No. 5503 OF 2017 (i 10 SEP 2025 . Current Section ov m DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS