APHC010887022018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 42934/2018 Between: 1. SMT. T.MAHESWARI, W/O K. MADHUMOHAN AGE 38 YEARS, OCC. MESSENGER, MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, GUDUR, KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PROJECT OFFICER, AP SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN A P, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN IBRAHIMPATNAM, AMARAVATHI, VIJAYAWADA TOWN, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI H SIDDAPPA, S/O. SHIVANANDAPPA NOW RE-ENGAGED AS MESSENGER AT MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, GUDUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 1st respondent in issuing the present impugned Procg.Rc.No.507/A1/2018, dated 18.11.2018 wherein by way of re-engagement, posting the unofficial respondent in the place of the petitioner, even though the unofficial respondent belonging in to Kouthalam Mandal and non native of Guduru Mandal, and cannot be posted other than his native Mandal, even without complying the principles of natural justice is as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, colorable exercise of power and contrary to the relevant provisions and if necessary set-a-side the same to the extent of posting the unofficial respondent in the place of the petitioner and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Messenger at Mandal Resource Centre at Gudur, of Kurnool 2 District without reference to the present impugned Procg.Rc.No. 507/A1/2018, dated 18.11.2018 of the 1st respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) 2. G SEENA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 1st respondent in issuing the present impugned Procg.Rc.No.507/A1/2018, dated 18.11.2018 wherein by way of re- engagement, posting the unofficial respondent in the place of the petitioner, even though the unofficial respondent belonging in to Kouthalam Mandal and non native of Guduru Mandal, and cannot be posted other than his native Mandal, even without complying the principles of natural justice is as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, colorable exercise of power and contrary to the relevant provisions and if necessary set-a-side the same to the extent of posting the unofficial respondent in the place of the petitioner and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Messenger at Mandal Resource Centre at Gudur, of Kurnool District without reference to the present impugned Procg.Rc.No.507/A1/2018, dated 18.11.2018 of the 1st respondent and to pass ....” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for official respondents placed on record the written instructions dated 23.06.2025 given by the District Educational Officer & Ex-Officio Project Coordinator, APSS, Kurnool, along with the copy of the letter dated 09.12.2018 showing that the Petitioner was appointed as Day Watch Women at KGBV School Guduru and the letter dated 3 20.12.2018 addressed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner to the Registrar (Judicial) to list the matter under the caption “Withdrawal”. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that on 09.12.2018 Petitioner was appointed as Day Watch Women and since then, she has been working as such in the same post. Hence, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 42934 of 2018 02.07.2025 Mjl /*