Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39393 (BOM)

NAVANATH VITTHAL ATAKAR (MALI) v. TUKARAM PANDU MALI SINCE DECD. THR HIS LRS

WP/4180/2025 · 2025-04-07

Shri N J Jamadar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10-wp-4180-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4180 OF 2025 Navanath Vitthal Atakar (Mali) … Petitioner V/s. Tukaram Pandu Mali Since deceased through His Lrs. … Respondents ------------------- Mr. Ashok Misal, for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Bhosale I.by Dilip Bodake, for the respondents. -------------------- CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 7TH APRIL 2025. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order. 3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. 4. The time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 5. The petition stands disposed as withdrawn. (N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha 1 of 1 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2025.04.10 13:44:10 +0530