[2025:RJ-JP:33328] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 78/2024 Narendra Kumar Yadav S/o Dharam Prakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Palpur Ki Dhani, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shubhra Singh, Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Shri Ravi Prakash Mathur, Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur 3. Dr. Shree Ram Sharma, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar. 4. Dr. Govind Singh, Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kotkasim, District Alwar. 5. Dr. Brijveer Singh, Prime Medical Officer, Community Health Center, Bibirani, Kotkasim, District Alwar (Raj.) 6. Anita, Proprietor, Burdak Services, C-74, Basant Bihar, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 7. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Govt. Department Of Medical And Health Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijesh Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ritika Naruka & Ms. Tanvisha Pant, for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, for Mr. Akshay Sharma, for R.5 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/08/2025 This contempt petition has been preferred by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 30.10.2023. [2025:RJ-JP:33328] (2 of 2) [CCP-78/2024] By an interim order dated 30.10.2023, the respondents were restrained from dispensing with the services of the petitioner as a contractual employee if his services were found to be satisfactory. Respondents have submitted the reply to the contempt petition and stated that the petitioner himself has joined some other employment on contractual basis on the post of Man with G.N.M. at Government Upper Primary School, Ghatla, Bhiwadi as is evident from the order dated 25.03.2025 which has been placed on record by the respondent as Annexure R/3. In view of the fact that the petitioner himself has joined at other place, he cannot claim to continue at earlier place. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as no contempt is made out against the respondents. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /204