- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41477-DB WP No. 8985 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 8985 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: GOPI S A S/O LATE ASWATH NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT, KSBCL DEPOT, BANGARPET, KOLAR, DISTICT - 563101, R/AT SRINIDHI NILAYA, BANGARPETE ROAD, NEAR THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, DHARMARAYA NAGAR, KOLAR DISTRICT - 5600101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHUPATHI M J .,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE STATE REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER BANGALURU - 560001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS ADDL CHIEF SECTARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (EXCISE) VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by MADHUSHREE H Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41477-DB WP No. 8985 of 2025 BANGALURU - 560001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, 2ND FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK, BMTC, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSONER OF EXCISE, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, BANGARAPET, KOLAR DISTRICT - 5600101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIKAS ROJIPURA., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 19/02/2025 PASSED ON A.NO.6181/2024 BY IN THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU, AS PER ANNEXURE-A; b) ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 13/12/2024 BY 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE- B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41477-DB WP No. 8985 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "The petitioner in the above case has challenged the order dated 19.2.2025 in App.No.6181/2024 passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal. During the time of filing the writ petition by over sight some of the important documents are not produced in the writ petition. Hence, petitioner seeking permission to withdrawn the above writ petition with reserving liberty to file fresh writ petition including all necessary documents. Under the above circumstance the petitioner seeking leave of this Hon'ble Court withdrawn above writ petition in the interest of justice and equity." Subject to all just exceptions, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn but with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE SA ct:sr