D Subramanyam S/o D Baskaraiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies ( CS-I ) Department
WP/13349/2015 · 2025-08-19
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39384 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39384 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010885542015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 13349/2015 Between:
1. D SUBRAMANYAM S/O D BASKARAIAH, R/O 30/213, VINAYAKAPURAM, ST COLONY, PUTTA MANDAL, CHITTORE DISTRICT - 517 583
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CSI DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOR, CHITTOR DISTRICT
3. THE TAHSILDAR, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT
4. SMT P LALITHA FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP NO.9, PUTTUR VILLAGE, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIt is therefore prayed that the Honble court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in withdrawing the resignation of the 4th respondent by his proceedings ROC B / 7131 /2014, dated. 26.12.2014 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural
justice and consequently set aside the same, and to pass such other order or orders which are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ARVIND KUMAR KATA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following order:
When the matter was listed on 04.08.2025 and 18.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
2. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 20.08.2025 KGR