Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010891502018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 43111/2018
Between:
1. K. ASHOK, S/O K. CHINA MALYADRI AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC . EMPLOYEE, R/O CHUNDI VILLAGE, V.V.
PALEM (M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT.. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ONGOLE
4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT SOCIETY ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VV PALEM MANDAL, VV PALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
6. THE ASSISTANT PROJECT DIRECTOR, KANDUKURU CLUSTER KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS (a)by declaring the impugned Proceedings R.C. No. D5/77/ EGS/2018 dated 06.10.2018 without issuing any charge memo, conducting enquiry though the Hon'ble High Court order dated 27.03.2018 made in WP No 9905 of 2018, directed the respondents to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action. is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to Art 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India and the same is liable to be set aside. and (b) consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service as Field Assistant with all consequential benefits and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceeding R.C. No. D5 /77/ ECG / 2018 dated 06.10.2018 issued by the 4th respondent by continuing the petitioner into service and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M S R CHANDRA MURTHY
2. G SESHADRI
3.
GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 43111 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 04.09.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 10.09.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 43111 of 2018
Date: 10.09.2025 PSA