Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39375 (BOM)

SARJERAO KESHAV SHINDE v. THE CHAIRMAN, SHRI RAMCHANDRA SHANKAR SAKUNDE VASANA PANCHKROSHI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ORS

WP/6538/2025 · 2025-07-07

Shri Gautam Ashwin Ankhad, Shri Ravindra V Ghuge

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24 wp 6538-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6538 OF 2025 Sarjerao Keshav Shinde .. Petitioner Versus The Chairman, Ramchandra Shankar Sakunde Vasana Panchkroshi Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Anu Kaladharan for the Petitioner. Mr. Mandar Limaye for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. P. N. Diwan, APP for the State. CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATE: 7th JULY, 2025 P. C. 1. Pursuant to the leave granted by this Court vide order dated 13th June, 2025, the Petition has been amended. 2. Mr. Limaye, learned Advocate tenders an Affidavit in reply on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. He submits that the Proposal has been Laxmi 1 LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.07.10 12:30:04 +0530 24 wp 6538-25.odt rectified and the revised Proposal has been submitted to Respondent No.3. The Management’s request is that Respondent No.3 may follow the due procedure laid down in law to take a decision with regard to the pay fixation of the Petitioner, strictly in accordance with the pay commission recommendations. 3. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to follow the due procedure laid down in law and carry out the pay fixation of the Petitioner’s pay scale within a period of 45 days from today keeping in view that the Petitioner is a 72 years aged retired employee. A reasoned order be passed and the same be communicated to the Management on its email address. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] Laxmi 2