APHC010882912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 42940/2018 Between: 1. PONNADA PAVAN KUMAR,, S/O.TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC . STUDENT R/O.SVR RESIDENCY, DOOR NO.4-40 FLAT NO.SF-3, POST OFFICE BACK SIDE KUNCHANPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. RASTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) P AND A CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT, 33, 'B' BLOCK PROJECT OFFICE, VSP, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. 2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, RASTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) P AND A CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT, 33, 'B' BLOCK PROJECT OFFICE, VSP, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the 2 action of the Respondents in not declaring the results in relation to 48 posts out of 98 posts in Metallurgy department without mentioning any reason as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of Indian Constitution and consequently direct the respondents to declare the results of remaining 48 posts in Metallurgy department which was conducted as per the Rectt.Advt.No.06/2018 dt.05.09.2018 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dt.12.11.2018 and 17.11.2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to fill up 48 posts other than the candidates who appeared for post of Junior Trainees in Metallurgy department by virtue of Rectt.Advt.No.06/2018, dt.05.09.2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T RAJINIKANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 42940 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. 2. On earlier occasion i.e., 25.07.2025, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the Writ Petition was filed regarding not declaring results in relation to 48 posts, out of 98 posts, as referred in the Writ Petition and by this time, nothing remains in the Writ Petition and therefore, it becomes infructuous. 3. Considering the said facts and circumstances, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 30.07.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 42940 of 2018 Date: 30.07.2025 PSA