1 APHC010878582018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42359/2018 Between: 1. V.ANANDA, S/O. LAKSHUMANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, JUNIOR LINEMAN (UNDER DISMISSAL), OPERATION SECTION, O/O. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, THAMBALLAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, MADANAPALLE (APSPDCL), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE (APSPDCL), TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HRD/APSPDCL, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSPDCL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by calling for the records relating the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing Memo.No. DE/O/MPL/JAO/ADM/S2/D/No.39/2017, dt. 11- 2 8-2017 and set aside the same, by declaring as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India, apart from violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service by conferring all consequential benefits and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on the Appeal filed by the petitioner dt. 01-11-2017, for reinstatement into service, forthwith, pending final disposal of the main W.P. and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S GOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition is filed seeking direction to the appellate authority for passing orders. In the light of the interim orders, the appeal was disposed of rejecting his claim. Learned counsel would further submit that the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders passed by the appellate authority. 3 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the appellate authority, according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.06.2025 ARR 4 181 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42359/2018 Dt.27.06.2025 ARR