1 2025:CGHC:45031 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9549 of 2025 1 - Priyanka Gupta W/o Shri Manish Kumar Aged About 39 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School, Sarkada, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Dpi, Old Building, Campus Board Of Secondary Education, Shailendra Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director, School Education Division, Division Raipur C.G. 4 - Collector, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Ekta Gandhi Teacher L.B., Govt. Middle Schoo, Sarkada, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Zainab Mustafa Vanak, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.03 19:39:12 +0530 2 03/09/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner bearing WPS No. 4839 of 2025 against her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 17.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection, if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/ 3 pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits, in objective manner, in accordance with law, as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved