-1- NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 921 of 2024 Harprasad Gupta S/o Late Gopal Prasad Gupta, Aged About 49 Years (Now 54 Years), R/o Vinoba Nagar, Tahsil And District-Bilaspur (C.G.) ----(Plaintiff) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Hukam Singh Rajput S/o Late Aman Singh Rajput, Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 634, Gali No.4, Ward No. 17, Imlipara, Tahsil And District-Bilaspur (C.G.) Current Address-Behind Rani Shati Mandir, Shanti Nagar, Tahsil And District-Bilaspur (C.G.), District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. -----(Defendant No.1) 2 - Rajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Gopal Prasad Gupta, Aged About 38 Years R/o Neta Nagar, Ward No. 2, Masturi, Tahsil-Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) -----(Defendant No.2) 3 - Maqsood Ahmad Ansari S/o Mahfuj Ahmad Ansari, Aged About 45 Years R/o Magarpara, Near Bajrang Bali Mandir, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District-Bilaspur (C.G.) ----- (Defendant No.3) 4 - Prahalad Verma S/o Namalum, Civil Engineer, Add.-Campus Of District Registrar Office, Bilaspur (C.G.) -------(Defendant No.4) 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through District Collector, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) ------ (Defendant No. 5) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Md. Rohul Amin Memon, Advocate Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20.06.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled before the National Lok Adalat on 10.05.2025. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim