Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39353 (RAJ)

IQBAL S/O MUMTAJ v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15085/2025 · 2025-12-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49972] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15085/2025 Iqbal S/o Mumtaj, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Pachiplya, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.309/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(A) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegations against the present petitioner is of cyber fraud. He further avowed that co-accused Rajmal in whose account money has been transferred has enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.11.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.09.2025. No custodial interrogation is required. Charge-sheet of the case has been filed. The trial of the case will [2025:RJ-JP:49972] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15085/2025] take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Iqbal S/o Mumtaj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR ),J Chandan/98