Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39350 (CHH)

RAMNATH GARUN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9518/2025 · 2025-08-24

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:42873 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9518 of 2025 Ramnath Garun S/o Lt. Shri Bahoran Ram Aged About 54 Years Currently Working At Tribal Boys Hostel, Ghughra, Block Sonhat, District- Koriya, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Director, Secretary, Department Of Schedule Tribe And Schedule Caste Delvelopment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Commissioner Department Of Schedule Tribe And Schedule Caste Delvelopment, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 3 - Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Koriya, District- Koriya, C.G. 4 - Collector Tribal Development, Koriya, District- Koriya, C.G. 5 - District Education Officer Koriya, District- Koriya, C.G. 6 - Om Prakash Rajvade Hostel Superintendent At Schudule Caste Post Matric Boys Hostel, Baikuthpur,, District- Koriya, C.G. ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Santosh Bharat, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25.08.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition claiming the following reliefs: Wps 9518 of 2025 2 “10.1 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the respondent authorities for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P5) of the petitioner after giving proper opportunity of hearing to her. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set aside order dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P4) with respect to the respondent no.06. 10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to consider the workplace of petitioner i.e. Tribal Boys Hostel, Ghughra, Block Sonhat, District-Koriya CG to be vacant. 10.5 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to allow the petitioner to work as hostel superintendent at Tribal Boys Hostel, Ghughra, Block Sonhat, District-Koriya CG, where he is presently posted, in the interest of justice. 10.6 that any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” Wps 9518 of 2025 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his submissions to the extent that vide order dated 24.06.2025, respondent authority had transferred respondent-6 in place of petitioner. Petitioner has been posted at Tribal Boys Hostel, Ghughra, block-Sonhat, District-Koriya, CG, and he is working there continuously for more than 15 years, and petitioner is willing to move fresh representation before the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance, and therefore, present petition may be disposed of directing the respondent authority to consider his fresh representation in accordance with law. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has no objection, if such fresh representation is moved by the petitioner, and the authority concerned may be directed to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Considering the limited submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition stands disposed of directing the petitioner that he may move fresh representation before the authority concerned within two weeks from today, and if in the eventuality of moving such representation, respondent-2 shall decide the representation of the petitioner as early as possible, in accordance with law on its own merits, in view of applicable rules and circulars holding the field. 5. Accordingly, with aforesaid observation and direction, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma