HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10482 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel states that the dispute between the parties is private in nature, which cannot be adjudicated by the Writ Court, therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed. 4. We have perused the records and find that the contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is correct. 5. The petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. October 8, 2025 Nitendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Poonam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad