Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39348 (RAJ)

NARENDRA KUMAR MEENA SON OF SHRI MADAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12722/2025 · 2025-10-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40868] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12722/2025 Narendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mukam Post Devta, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Presently Residing At Ward No.25, Shivpuri Mohalla, Khetri Mod, Neem Ka Thana, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Joint Director, College Education, Commissionerate , College Education Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Govt. S.n.k.p. Govt. College, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.). 4. College Development Society, Govt. College, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) Through Its President. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking following relief:- (i) By way of writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner to the post of Clerk/Assistant employee. (ii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iii) Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:40868] (2 of 2) [CW-12722/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is currently working in S.N.K.P. Government College, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar as Clerk and he is entitled for regularization on basis of continued service for approximately last 10 years. He further submits that presently he is working at the mercy of the respondents and in an identical matter, a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court has granted stay in case of Chitransh Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6217/2023), on 26.04.2023. 3. Having considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks from from now. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /17