THE GENERAL SECRETARY, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST v. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HPCL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST
WA/1636/2017 · 2025-06-19
Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39344 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39344 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATl FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE present THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Si 6;\ > of r WRIT APPEAL NO: 1636 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 27.03.2017 in WP No. 4686/2006 on the file of the High Court- Between: The General Secretary, HPCL Employees Union (Visakh Refinery) (CITU), Qr.No. C-15, West Yarada Park, Sriharipuram, Visakhapatnam-53001 1 ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN WP^ AND The Chief General Manager HPCL, Visakh Refinery, P.O.Box No. 15, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam-530011 ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN WP I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWAMP. NO: 3115 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 27.03.2017 passed in WP.NO. 4686/2006 pending disposal of the writ appeal aficfepae® ‘ Counsel for the Appellant: SRI PRAKASH BUDDARAPU Counsel for the Respondent: SMT. A V S LAXMI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
APHC010871402017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT APPEAL NO:1636 of 2017 Between; The General Secretary, Visakhapatnam Dist ...APPELLANT AND The Chief General Manager HpcI Visakhapatnam Dist Counsel for the Appellant: ...RESPONDENT 1.PRAKASH BUDDARAPU Counsel for the Respondent:
1.A VS LAXMI The Court made the following: In view of the letter dated 16.06.2025 addressed to the Registry, seeking withdrawal of the writ appeal and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU p EP UTY^ REG1STRAR ^lo^lCER To, SE
1. One CO to Sri Prakash Buddarapu, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CO to Smt. A V S Laxmi, Advocate [OPUC] ^
3. Three CD Copies TF
HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.1636 of 2017 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS <3r