Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39344 (ALL)

SHYAM VILAS AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/11945/2025 · 2025-04-10

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53833 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11945 of 2025 Applicant :- Shyam Vilas And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hiralal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Hiralal, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Pushpraj Singh, learned brief holder for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 626 of 2025 (State Vs. Shyam Vilas and others), arising out of N.C.R. No. 33 of 2024, under Section 323 of I.P.C., Police Station Saiyad Raja, District Chandauli, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 11.02.2025, pending in the court of C.J.M., Chandauli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offence punishable under Sections 323 of I.P.C. is non-cognizable offence as per provision of Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. the case could not be a State case and it has been proceeded as a State case, the cognizance/ summoning order is an abuse of the process of law. 4. Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. is reproduced herein below: "2(d). complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report. Explanation.-A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complainant, and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant;" 5. A bare perusal of explanation added to Section 2(d) shows that this explanation speaks about cases where police has investigated a cognizable case but investigation made discloses a non-cognizable offence. 6. In view of what has been stated above, the present application is disposed of. The order impugned dated 11.02.2025 passed by C.J.M., Chandauli, is, hereby, quashed. The matter is remanded back to the Court concerned and the Magistrate is directed to pass a fresh order after applying the judicial mind. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 A.P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad