[2025:RJ-JP:26496] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10540/2025 Prahlad Singh S/o Shri Satidan Singh, aged about 75 Years, R/o Village Dhani Pavna Ki @ Tanwran, Tan Village Sonthliya, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Collector, Department of Rev- enue, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. 2. Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) 3. Sub Division Officer, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ankul Gupta & Mr.Rahul Ghiya JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following order:- “In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that his Hon’ble Court may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and fur- ther call for the record relating to the case and further: A. By an appropriate writ order or direction or in nature thereof thereby direct the respon- dents to decided the Representation dated 06.06.2025 and further, direct the respondents to remove the encroachments from public way/path; B. Cost of litigation may also be awarded to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:26496] (2 of 2) [CW-10540/2025] C. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the limited prayer for issuing direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner. 3. It appears that before approaching this Court, the petitioner submitted a representation before the Sub-Divisional Officer in the month of June, 2025 and the same is lying pending for its adjudication on its merits. 4. Without going into the controversy involved in the matter, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition by issuing direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the aforesaid representation, pending if any, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of order, after granting opportunity of hearing to all the respective persons. 4. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/ direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. They are at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /56