Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39336 (AP)

NARAYANAM MADHAVA RAO v. NARAYANAM SRINIVASA ANJANEYULU

CRP/5439/2017 · 2025-07-13

Harinath N

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J C.R.P.No.5439_2017 APHC010874802017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5439/2017 Between: 1. NARAYANAM MADHAVA RAO, S/O. PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. WEAVER COLONY, NIDUBROLU, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF MANIKANTA JEANS CORNER, READY MADE AND TEXTILES, MAIN ROAD, GANNAVARAM POST & MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. NARAYANAM SRINIVASA ANJANEYULU, S/o. Madhava Rao, Aged about 47 years, R/o. Weavers colony, Ponnuru, Nidubrolu, presently residing at Neataji Nagar, Near Praja Vaidyasala, Nidubrolu, Ponnuru Town, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto set-aside the order passed in E.P.No.11 of 2017 in O.S.No.266 of 2005, dated 14.9.2017 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram, Krishna District and consequently, declare that the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram Krishna District has no jurisdiction to entertain the E.P.No. 11 of 2017 in which the award dated 3.12.2011 passed by the Lok-Adalath, Ponnuru, Guntur District is sough to be executed and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 7064 OF 2017 2 HN, J C.R.P.No.5439_2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.11 of 2017 in O.S.No.266 of 2005, on the file Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram Vijayawada, Krishna District, pending disposal of the revision Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R AVULA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GADE VENKATESWARA RAO 3 HN, J C.R.P.No.5439_2017 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable, as the suit was dismissed as not pressed on 26.07.2023, the E.P. having not been pressed by the DHR. 2. As the Execution Petition which was filed seeking execution of the decree passed in O.S.No.266 of 2005, was not pressed and was consequently dismissed on 26.07.2023, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this Civil Revision Petition. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 14.07.2025 NKA 4 HN, J C.R.P.No.5439_2017 188 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Civil Revision Petition Nos. 5439 of 2017 Date: 14.07.2025 NKA