2025:CGHC:46152 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9410 of 2025 1 - Prabhakar Shukla S/o Ramkrishna Shukla Aged About 32 Years Working On The Post Of Sub-Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Raipur R/o Block- 5, Sai Mandir, Sai Complex, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Under Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Director Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondents ________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate. For State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General For R/4 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate ________________________________________________________ KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.09.11 10:37:08 +0530 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 10.09.2025 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of the appeal pending before the Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, Raipur. 2. Brief facts as reflected from the record are that the petitioner was suspended on 11.11.2024 vide Annexure P/1 by the Under Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department. He has preferred appeal before the Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, Raipur. In the meanwhile, he has been served with the charge-sheet in the month of December, 2024. He has filed this petition with prayer that the appellate authority may be directed to decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. Since the petitioner has been served with charge-sheet, it is directed that the Inquiry Officer shall complete the inquiry proceeding and the Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal expeditiously. 4. With these observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Deshmukh