Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39329 (JHR)

MANMEET SINGH GUJRAL ALIAS ANMOL ALIAS MANPREET SINGH GUJRAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11484/2025 · 2025-12-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:38394 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11484 of 2025 ------ Manmeet Singh @ Manmeet Singh Gujral @ Manpreet Singh Gujral @ Anmol, S/o Late Amarjeet Singh, R/o H. No. 04, Gurudwara Basti, Road No. 01, P.O. & P.S. –Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District –East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kr. Trivedi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 19.12.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.313 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 219 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 135 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 13.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4111 of 2025. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile two witnesses including the P.W.1 who identified the petitioner in the T.I. Parade has been examined but neither of them have supported the case of the prosecution and they were declared hostile and even though the prosecution put leading questions to them, still they have not supported the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.10.2024 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 29 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. -VI, Jamshedpur, in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.313 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 219 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 135 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 19.12.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-