Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39321 (KAR)

N.A.VENKATESH GUPTA v. THE STATE BY

CRL.P/1209/2022 · 2025-10-14

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40628 CRL.P No. 1209 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1209 OF 2022 (482 (Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. N.A. VENKATESH GUPTA S/O LATE N S ANJAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. N A KRISHNAIAH SETTY S/O LATE N S ANJAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS NO.1 & 2 ARE R/AT NO.6, PUTTANNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560 004. 3. N A JAYARAM S/O LATE N S ANJAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS NO.23, 4TH MAIN ROAD NEW THARAGUPET BENGALURU-560 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUSUDHAN M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VISWANATHA SHETTY V., ADVOCATE FOR P.1 AND P.2; SRI DHARMAPAL, ADVOCATE FOR P.3.) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40628 CRL.P No. 1209 of 2022 AND: 1. THE STATE BY HEBBAGODI P S BENGALURU REP. BY THE SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ANEKAL SUB-DIVISION ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106. 3. D MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE DEKAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT BOMMASANDRA VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAVISHA M.G., ADVOCATE FOR R.3) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE IN CRIME NO.392/2019 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 447, 427, 506 and 149 OF IPC MUCH LESS PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3(1)(V) OF SC/ST ATROCITIES ACT 1989, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40628 CRL.P No. 1209 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners together submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The learned counsel for petitioner Nos.1 and 2 have filed a memo dated 14.10.2025, and the learned counsel for petitioner No.3 has filed a memo dated 18.09.2025 in this regard. The same are placed on record. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2