Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:44038 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9717 of 2025 1 - Siyaram Patre S/o Shri Tirathram Aged About 52 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village Ruso (Kapa), P.O. Ruso, Tahsil Kawardha,
District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 2 - Bholaram Bhardwaj S/o Shri Siddhram Aged About 43 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village Ruso (Kapa), P.O. Ruso, Tahsil
Kawardha,
District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 3 - Rajjuram S/o Shri Jagdish Yadav Aged About 48 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village And Post Kunda, Tahsil Kawardha, District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 4 - Bhanu Pratap Satyavanshi S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Aged About 37 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village And P.O. Bodla,
Tahsil
Kawardha,
District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 5 - Ramkumar Purna S/o Shri Kashiram Aged About 41 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village Manikpur, P.O. Neurgaon Kala, Tahsil
Kawardha,
District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 6 - Ram Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Jeetram Sahu Aged About 41 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village And P.O. Nanapuri, Tahsil Kawardha,
District-
Kabirdham
C.G. 7 - Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Bharat Sahu Aged About 37 Years Daily Wages Employee (Field Assistant), R/o Village Ruso Karesara,, P.O. Sarangpurkala, Tahsil Kawardha, District- Kabirdham C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur C.G. 2 - Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Block- B, 2nd And 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur C.G. 3 - Managing Director/collector, Bhoramdeo Cooperative Sugar Mill, Ramhepur, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G.
... Respondent(s)
2 Order on Board 29/08/2025
Shri Ritesh Verma, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. Prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Inder