Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39312 (AP)

SARVESETTY HEMALATHA@SUDHA v. BALIA MUKUNDA RAO AND THREE OTHERS

CRP/6105/2017 · 2025-02-21

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010873612017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6105/2017 Between: Sarvesetty Hemalatha@sudha ...PETITIONER AND Balia Mukunda Rao And Three Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MANIK PRABHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M V SURESH The Court made the following: ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel on record on either side that, the cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive. 2. The said submissions are placed on record. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 21st February, 2025 RKS