ii IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE " PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 1542 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 ofthe Letters Patent Appeal against the order dated 13.06.2017 in WP No.31910 of 2014 on the file of the High Court. Between: St. John’s Church High School, East Marredpally, Hyderabad, Rep. of the Chairman of the Education Committee of Schools administered of South India, Sri Vimal Sukumar, S/o. Bishop Sugandhar, R/o. Secunderabad. AMARAV^ by Church ...Appellant/Petitioner AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employment, Training & Factories Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Union of India Delhi. 3. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Hill Fort Road Hyderabad, rep. by its Regional Director and Recovery Officer. 4. The Deputy Director, E.S.I. Corporation, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 5. The Recovery Officer, Office of the E.S.I. Corporation Shapurwadi, Hyderabad. rep. by Ministry of Health, Shastri Bhavan, New Shapurwadi Hill Fort Road, ...Respondents/Respondents LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(WAMP. NO: 2859 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents/Employees' State Insurance Corporation not to insist the petitioner to comply with the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, pending disposal of the writ appeal and grant Counsel for the Appellant; M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5: SRI B. G. RAVINDER REDDY, SC FOR ESI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT I Bench Sr.No:-3 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010855442017 S; WRIT APPEAL NO; 1542 of 2017 St. John's Church High School, Secunderabad ...Appellant Vs. ...Respondents The State of Telangana and others ********** None Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General. Advocate for Appellant Advocate for Respondents CORAM ;THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ; 25th March 2025 DATE P C : None for the appellant. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was that the appellant has lost representation for the appellant. It appears interest to prosecute the matter. no Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order 2. as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, including l.A.No.2 of 2017 shall stand closed Sd/- V.DIWAKAR qeputYj registrar ^FICER //TRUE COPY// SE To Associates, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/s. Bharadwaj 2. One CC to Sri B. G. i CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, 1. Ravinder Reddy, SC for ESI [OPUC] Deputy Solicitor General of India, 3. One High Court of A.P. [OPUC] CCS to GP for Labour, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Two 5. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:25/03/2025 JUDGMENT g 0 9 APR 2025 Current section WA.No.1542 of 2017 P» DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS